business

Fine-based revenue model under TraffiTech-GH could influence enforcement fairness – Bright Simons

Fine-based revenue model under TraffiTech-GH could influence enforcement fairness – Bright Simons

Policy analyst Bright Simons has raised concerns about the revenue-sharing arrangement under Ghana’s automated traffic enforcement system, TraffiTech-GH, warning that making a private operator’s earnings dependent on traffic fines could create incentives that undermine fairness in enforcement. Mr Simons identified the revenue-sharing structure as a particular area of concern, explaining that Nationwide Traffic Management and Enforcement Limited (NTMEL), the private partner operating the system, is entitled to 40 per cent of revenue generated, while the government receives the remaining 60 per…

Policy analyst Bright Simons has raised concerns about the revenue-sharing arrangement under Ghana’s automated traffic enforcement system, TraffiTech-GH, warning that making a private operator’s earnings dependent on traffic fines could create incentives that undermine fairness in enforcement. He argues that although public-private partnerships (PPPs) can improve public service delivery, the structure of the TraffiTech-GH arrangement requires careful scrutiny because the private operator earns a share of revenue generated from penalties imposed on motorists.

Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile on Saturday, November 7, Mr Simons said the private sector naturally pursues commercial interests, making it necessary for government to establish safeguards that protect the public interest. He stressed that he had no objection to public-private partnerships but said the financial arrangements must be designed to prevent private profit motives from conflicting with public objectives.

“It’s a public-private partnership, and there’s absolutely nothing wrong with public-private partnerships. In fact, we have a whole law on it. We have a whole range of policies on public-private partnerships, precisely because there are times when the private sector have capacities that the government or the public sector can tap into for the benefit of all of us,” he said.

“The problem, though, is that the private sector don’t go into these things with public interest in their mind. They go in to make money. So you always have to balance the public interest and the private profit motive extremely delicately. If you don’t, you get into trouble,” he added. Mr Simons identified the revenue-sharing structure as a particular area of concern, explaining that Nationwide Traffic Management and Enforcement Limited (NTMEL), the private partner operating the system, is entitled to 40 per cent of revenue generated, while the government receives the remaining 60 per cent.

According to the Ministry of Finance’s 2024 Annual Report on Public-Private Partnership Projects, the arrangement provides for a 40 per cent share to the private partner and 60 per cent to the government over the project’s 11-year concession period. The project has an estimated investment cost of GH¢77.73 million. Mr Simons questioned whether generating revenue from fines was the appropriate basis for compensating the private operator, given the possible implications for enforcement practices.

“Our concern is whether or not the revenue should come from fines, and what that incentive to get more revenue from fines means for the fairness of implementation,” he said. He also identified Swedish technology company Sensys Gatso Group as the entity responsible for providing and controlling the technology that drives the system. He noted that the company had worked with the local project promoter, Franco Osei, for several years before the arrangement was established.

Concerns over enforcement incentives Mr Simons’ concern centres on the potential conflict between the commercial interests of the private operator and the objective of ensuring road safety. Under the arrangement, an increase in revenue from traffic fines could translate into higher earnings for the private partner. This, he suggested, raises questions about how the system will ensure that enforcement decisions are guided strictly by road safety considerations and not revenue generation.

The concern is particularly relevant to the fairness of automated enforcement, including how violations are identified, verified and penalties imposed on motorists. TraffiTech-GH uses cameras, sensors and other technology to identify traffic violations, including speeding and running red lights. The Ghana Police Service has said captured footage will be reviewed by personnel before electronic notices are issued, while motorists who dispute violations can challenge them in court.

The programme commenced live citation capture on November 1, 2026, following an extension of the public education period. The government’s stated objectives include improving compliance with road traffic regulations, reducing road crashes and improving road safety. However, Mr Simons believes the revenue-sharing model deserves further public scrutiny to ensure that the financial returns expected by the private partner do not undermine the fairness and credibility of the enforcement system.

His comments have renewed attention on the financial structure of TraffiTech-GH and the need to balance private sector participation with accountability in the use of technology to enforce road traffic laws.

  • revenue
  • enforcement
  • simons
  • fairness
  • fine
  • concern
  • arrangement
  • partnership

Summaries and tags are generated automatically. Stay informed with VidiaNews.

Related news

Good intentions not enough to guarantee success of TraffiTech-GH – Bright Simons
politics

Good intentions not enough to guarantee success of TraffiTech-GH – Bright Simons

The Honorary Vice President of IMANI Africa, Bright Simons, says the success of the TraffiTech-GH initiative should be judged by how effectively it is implemented rather than the good intentions behind its introduction. Mr Simons explained that the assessment of public initiatives should distinguish between politics and policy, explaining that while the political argument behind TraffiTech-GH was difficult to fault, the policy and implementation processes required closer examination.

Read →
TraffiTech-GH: Viewing enforcement as revenue tool derails road safety efforts – Sharif Khalid
business

TraffiTech-GH: Viewing enforcement as revenue tool derails road safety efforts – Sharif Khalid

Economic Advisor to the Office of the Vice President, Sharif Mahmud Khalid, has cautioned against viewing the TraffiTech-GH automated traffic enforcement system primarily as a revenue-generating initiative, arguing that such an approach could undermine its road safety objectives. Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile on Saturday, November 7, Mr Khalid said focusing on the financial returns from the system could distract from the government’s objective of reducing dangerous driving and improving safety on the roads.

Read →
Traffitech must not become government revenue tool at motorists’ expense – Fiifi Boafo
business

Traffitech must not become government revenue tool at motorists’ expense – Fiifi Boafo

Former Head of Public Affairs at the Ghana Cocoa Board (COCOBOD), Fiifi Boafo, has questioned the financial motive behind the introduction of the new automated traffic enforcement system, Traffitech, warning that it must not become a revenue-generating venture for the government rather than a road safety intervention. Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile on Saturday, November 7, Mr Boafo said authorities needed to clarify whether Traffitech was intended to punish traffic offenders, deter motorists from violating road regulations and prevent accidents, or generate revenue for the government.

Read →
Was TrafficTech-GH designed to raise revenue for gov’t? – Fiifi Boafo questions 60% share of fines
business

Was TrafficTech-GH designed to raise revenue for gov’t? – Fiifi Boafo questions 60% share of fines

Former COCOBOD Director of Public Affairs, Fiifi Boafo, has questioned the government’s decision to take 60 per cent of fines generated under the TrafficTech-GH system, suggesting that the arrangement raises concerns about whether the initiative is intended to improve road safety or generate revenue for the state. Mr Boafo’s concerns centred on the revenue-sharing arrangement under which the private investors behind the project are expected to receive 40 per cent of the penalties collected, while the government takes the remaining 60 per cent.

Read →
Ghana loses $6.5bn in potential mining revenue – IFS
business

Ghana loses $6.5bn in potential mining revenue – IFS

Comparing the systems in Ghana to Botswana’s, for instance, he said the southern African country generated $13.4 billion in value added from mining in 2025, while Ghana’s revenue from the sector amounted to only $1.6 billion, representing 11.9 per cent of the sector’s value. Dr Boakye attributed Botswana’s stronger performance to the government’s active involvement in the mining sector through partnerships with private companies.

Read →