politics

Judge allows Trump’s $10bn defamation case against BBC to proceed

Judge allows Trump’s $10bn defamation case against BBC to proceed

A federal judge in Florida has allowed US President Donald Trump’s defamation case against the BBC to go ahead after the broadcaster sought to dismiss it. Earlier this year, Trump’s lawyers conceded they had no evidence that the documentary was available in the US on the BBC’s BritBox subscription service – as they originally argued – or on the BBC’s website, BBC Select or through US broadcasters.

A federal judge in Florida has allowed US President Donald Trump's defamation case against the BBC to go ahead after the broadcaster sought to dismiss it.

But Judge Jeffrey Kuntz dismissed a second claim in the $10bn (£7.5bn) lawsuit under the state's unfair trade practices law.

The US president is suing the BBC over an episode of Panorama that edited together two different sections of a speech he gave before the riot at the US Capitol in 2021.

Trump called the judge's ruling a "huge victory" in a Truth Social post on Tuesday. A BBC spokesperson said: "We are surprised by this decision but respect the Court's authority and note the case will now proceed to the next stage."

The BBC spokesperson added: "We remain confident in our position and will continue to respond through the proper legal process."

Judge Kuntz found Trump's defamation allegations against the BBC sufficient for the case to continue, although he did not make a ruling on the merits of the case.

"Whether President Trump can prove these claims and establish he sustained damages at summary judgment or trial is left for another day," he wrote in Tuesday's order.

Trump's lawsuit - filed in Florida - accuses the BBC of "intentionally, maliciously and deceptively doctoring" the speech he gave outside the Capitol on 6 January 2021.

The BBC apologised and said that the broadcast had given "the mistaken impression that Trump made a direct call for violent action".

The broadcaster has since asked that the court dismiss the lawsuit, arguing the programme does not meet the legal criteria for defamation and was not available in the US.

Along with defamation, Trump claimed in the lawsuit that the broadcaster had violated Florida law, specifically the Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

Kuntz on Tuesday dismissed that part of the lawsuit, ruling that the documentary did not constitute commercial speech.A judge ordered Trump last month to answer questions under oath in the lawsuit by 11 December, after the president cancelled a previous deposition last month, citing "matters of national importance".

A lawyer representing the BBC said in court that Trump was campaigning in Georgia in October on the scheduled day and had "prioritised that" over answering their questions.

Earlier this year, Trump's lawyers conceded they had no evidence that the documentary was available in the US on the BBC's BritBox subscription service - as they originally argued - or on the BBC's website, BBC Select or through US broadcasters.

Trump ultimately agreed to drop BBC Studios, the broadcaster's commercial arm, from his defamation lawsuit, after the BBC argued that it had "no role in creating or producing the documentary".

  • bbc
  • trump
  • judge
  • defamation
  • case
  • lawsuit
  • broadcaster
  • president

Summaries and tags are generated automatically. Stay informed with VidiaNews.

Related news

Federal judge allows Trump’s $10bn defamation lawsuit against BBC to proceed
politics

Federal judge allows Trump’s $10bn defamation lawsuit against BBC to proceed

Trump-appointed judge Jeffrey T Kuntz partially denies British broadcaster’s motion to dismiss over edit Federal judge Jeffrey T Kuntz ruled on Tuesday that Donald Trump’s lawsuit against the BBC can proceed, denying in part the British broadcaster’s motion to dismiss the case. “Accepting the allegations in the complaint as true, the Court finds Trump plausibly pled damages where Trump alleges a defamatory documentary released toward the election caused reputational harm,” the Trump-appointed Florida district court judge wrote.

Read →
Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron file new defamation lawsuit against Candace Owens
politics

Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron file new defamation lawsuit against Candace Owens

Legal battle escalates as far-right US podcaster continues to spread false claims that France’s first lady was born a man Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron have brought a fresh defamation lawsuit against Candace Owens in her home state of Tennessee, in an escalation of a transatlantic legal battle as the far-right US podcaster continues to spread false claims that France’s first lady was born a man. The Macrons first sued Owens and her media companies in July 2025 in Delaware in response to what the French first couple called “verifiably false and devastating lies” being repeated by Owens on her po

Read →
US House blocks impeachment bid against Hegseth over Iran war
politics

US House blocks impeachment bid against Hegseth over Iran war

Republicans in the US House of Representatives on Tuesday blocked an effort to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over the Iran war, handing President Donald Trump a victory days after his party’s crushing midterm election defeat. Other allegations involved the 2025 conflict with Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthis and strikes on alleged drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, which Massie branded “extrajudicial killings.”

Read →
House Republicans block effort to impeach Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth
politics

House Republicans block effort to impeach Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth

Trump ally, accused of an array of illegal acts, had earlier condemned impeachment push as ‘a farce and a stunt’ House Republicans on Tuesday blocked an effort to impeach Pete Hegseth, rejecting allegations that the defense secretary had repeatedly violated the constitution through his handling of the Iran war and other conflicts globally. The vote came a week after Republicans lost control of the Senate and House of Representatives in their worst midterm election in more than a half century, and underscored how lawmakers remain wary of crossing Donald Trump, who has signaled his continued sup

Read →
Who is Jim Jordan? Pugnacious Trump ideologue to lead diminished Republican ranks
politics

Who is Jim Jordan? Pugnacious Trump ideologue to lead diminished Republican ranks

Controversial far-right congressman defied 2022 subpoena from Capitol attack panel and was accused of ignoring sexual abuse as college wrestling coach The election of Jim Jordan on Tuesday to lead House Republicans elevates a combative Donald Trump ideologue who defied a congressional subpoena over the 6 January attack, as the party tries as it tries to adjust to life out of power. But it is a triumph for the Ohio Republican who was pushed out of the contentious House speakership race three years ago after his Republican colleagues repeatedly voted against his bid for the gavel in the chaotic…

Read →